I am a
theatre director who has recently (three years ago) joined the world of
academia. Why did I do this, especially in a country that still views
"those that can, do it: those that can't, teach it"? I would like to
reach back in time and shake GBS warmly by his scrawny neck for creating
an attitude of snobbery and separation between practitioners and
practitioner/teachers that has never gone away.
I
worked in professional theatre from 1979 to 2007. In that time I saw
endless rounds of cuts to the arts, especially during the Thatcher
period. At times, it seemed that my career was in a strange type of
recession. I joined the profession when the joyous good times in arts
seemed to have gone and life was becoming grim. I was lucky to stay in
work 90% of the time but felt like a Jonah as each company I worked for
faced funding crises and the majority closed. My c.v. looks like a
memorial to companies past.
I
progressed to running companies myself and quickly learnt that the term
"Artistic Director" is a misnomer - you have no time to be artistic as
an AD - its all about the administration and funding. I ran 5 companies
in total - all with artistic success and some with financial stability.
In 2007 I grew tired of the constant battle with the Arts Council and
instead joined a University. What was wonderful was the chance to create
interesting theatre without having to sell a tour and to work with new
and rewarding talent. What I didn't anticipate was the sheer lunacy of
the higher educational system and the vicious snakepit that is daily
academic life.
No comments:
Post a Comment